State v. Uthe
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Per curiam
The question in the present case is whether the district court has a duty to provide the department of corrections with an updated presentence investigation report after a defendant has noted inaccuracies in the report before the court. The defendant, Stephen Uthe, contends the district court has a duty to order a corrected presentenee report for use by the department of corrections after it is notified of inaccuracies. We do not believe the district court has such a duty and we affirm.
Uthe pleaded guilty to one count of forgery in violation of Iowa Code sections 715A.2(1) and 715A.2(2)(a)…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1992
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. GrandberrySupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
- Campbell v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
- David Jay Nuno v. State of IowaCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2025
- State of Iowa v. Courtney Morgan AshbyCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2025