Legal Opinion

Ingalls v. Smith

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 9, 1915No. 19,205PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Cowley district court; Carroll L. Swarts, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Benson, J.:

This is another of the frequently recurring actions to recover commissions upon a real-estate deal. A verdict was returned for the defendant, which was set aside. A new trial was ordered, and both parties appeal.

The ground upon which the verdict was set aside is not stated.

It was said in K. C. W. & N. W. Rid. Co. v. Ryan, 49 Kan. 1, 30 Pac. 108:

“It has been the unvarying decision of the court to permit no verdict to stand unless both the jury and the court trying the cause could, within the rules prescribed, approve the same.” (p. 12.)

The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kansas City, Wyandotte & Northwestern Railroad v. RyanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892
  2. Ireton v. IretonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
  3. Hutton v. StewartSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  4. White v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  5. Rowell v. Cedarvale Oil, Gas & Mining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Klopfenstein v. Union Traction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  2. Clark v. Southwestern Greyhound Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  3. DeYoung v. ReilingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948
  4. Ingalls v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  5. Loit v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API