Legal Opinion

Hertz Corp. v. State Farm Mutual Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 1, 1997No. C3-96-2050Published

1Opinion of the Court

*742OPINION

MARTIN J. MANSUR, Judge.

Appellant, the insurance company providing coverage on a car renter’s personal vehicle, challenges the district court’s summary judgment in favor of respondent car rental company declaring that appellant, and not respondent car rental company, provides liability coverage for renter involved in accident with rented ear. We affirm.

FACTS

Respondent Hertz Corporation (Hertz) is a car rental business. On August 2, 1994, it rented a car in Minnesota to Jeffrey Powers. Powers became involved in an accident while driving the vehicle on August 3, 1994, and the driver of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Hibbing Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Enterprise Leasing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1996
  4. McClain v. BegleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  5. Daybreak Foods, Inc. v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API