Legal Opinion
Fluck v. Coffman
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided September 22, 1999No. 32,100-CAPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtI .stewart, J.
This appeal arises from a medical malpractice action. The plaintiff-appellant, Margaret Fluck, appeals the trial court judgment granting a Motion for Summary Judgment in favor of the defendant-appel-lee, Leslie R. Coffman, M.D. We affirm.
FACTS
In October 1994, Margaret Fluck (“Mrs.Fluck”) sought medical attention from Dr. Leslie R. Coffman (“Dr. Coff-man”) for urinary incontinence. Dr. Coff-man, an obstetrician/gynecologist (OB/GYN), has his principal place of business is in Monroe, Louisiana. Dr. Coff-man performed bladder suspension surgery (an anterior cystrourethropexy) on Mrs. Fluck on…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hondroulis v. SchuhmacherSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
- Elizabeth Steinberg v. Indemnity Insurance Company of North America, Indemnity Insurance Company of North America v. Elizabeth SteinbergCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- Iseah v. EA Conway Memorial Hosp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1991
- Rance v. Harrison Co., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1999
- Elliott v. RobinsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Langford v. Schumpert Medical CenterLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2000
- Fluck v. CoffmanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2003