Legal Opinion
Wasmuth v. Allen
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 27, 1964PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJohn P. Donohoe, J.
Defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint is granted. Plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction is, accordingly, denied.
The complaint in this action sets forth nine causes of action on behalf of various persons who are chiropractors. The complaint demands judgment declaring that certain portions of article 132 of the Education Law which require examinations as a prerequisite to licensing chiropractors are unconstitutional. The main thrust of the complaint is directed at the subject matter to be covered by the examinations and is based upon allegations to the effect that (1) subject…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Dent v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- South Carolina State Highway Department v. Barnwell Bros.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Williams v. Mayor of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Radice v. People of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- People Ex Rel. Nechamcus v. Warden of the City PrisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Martin v. State Liquor AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1964
- Wasmuth v. AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1964
- Tyler v. Eastern Discount Corp.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1968
- Albert v. AllenNew York Supreme Court · 1965