Legal Opinion
McNeal v. Marco Bay Associates
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided August 6, 1986No. 85-1601PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
SANDERLIN, Judge.
Appellants challenge an order which granted appellees' motion for directed verdict and dismissed appellants’ action for specific performance of a real estate purchase contract and damages. For the reasons stated below, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.
The record reveals the following facts.
On March 11, 1982, and through several assignments, appellant McNeal became the contract purchaser of a condominium unit to be built by appellee Marco Bay Associates (Marco Bay). The assignment contained a “time is of the essence” clause. A certificate of occupancy was issued…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cilabot v. Winter Park Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1894
- Felt v. MorseSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
- Thomas N. Carlton Estate v. KellerSupreme Court of Florida · 1951
- National Exhibition Company v. BallDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
- L'Engle v. OverstreetSupreme Court of Florida · 1911
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Torres v. K-Site 500 AssociatesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994