Mikulski v. Ziolkowski
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 42, March T., 1919, by defendants, from judgment of C. P. Lackawanna Co., November T., 1918, No. 88, sustaining judgment of Justice of the Peace in the case of Anthony Mikulski v. Joseph Ziolkowski and Mary Ziolkowski. Certiorari to justice of the peace. Before Edwards, P. J. The opinion of the Superior Court states the case. The court dismissed the exceptions and affirmed the proceedings before the justice of the peace. Error assigned, was the order of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Porter, J.,
The plaintiff commenced this proceeding by a complaint before an alderman, under the provisions of the Act of December 14, 1863, P. L. (1864), 1125 and its supplements, including the Act of March 31, 1905, P. L. 87, to recover possession of certain premises owned by complainant and alleged to have been leased to the appellants for a definite term, which had expired. The alderman heard the parties and entered judgment in the following form: “After hearing sworn proofs and allegations, defendant being in default, Alderman Jacob Smith doth now publicly enter judgment in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887
- Givens v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1869
- Hickey v. ConleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
- Ballou v. MehringSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
3Cited by12 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Pennsylvania Milk Products Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Anderson v. McHenrySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Lynch v. Hickey Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Thompson v. HedrickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Commonwealth v. Banovich, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Somerset County1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.