Legal Opinion

Koo v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 22, 1994No. 45A05-9301-CR-6PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUCKER, Judge.

Young Soo Koo was convicted of rape as a Class B felony1 for which he received a twenty-year sentence. He now appeals raising eight issues for our review which we rephrase as follows:

1. Whether the judge pro tempore improperly presided over the trial of this case;

2. Whether the trial court erred in denying Koo’s peremptory challenges of two female venirepersons on the basis of gender;

3. Whether the trial court erred by admitting evidence of Koo’s prior, uncharged acts of sexual misconduct;

4. Whether the trial court erred by refusing to allow Koo to introduce testimony of the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. JEB v. Alabama Ex Rel. TBSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. McDonald v. PlessSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. Lannan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1992

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Roche v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Young Soo Koo v. Daniel R. McBride SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  3. Bryant v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Floyd v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. NelsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2012

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API