Legal Opinion

Friedman v. F.E. Myers Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 11, 1989No. Civ. A. 88-3033PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

NEWCOMER, District Judge.

The matter is before the court on defendant F.E. Myers Co.’s (Myers) post-trial motions for new trial on jury issue, new trial on other issues, and judgment notwithstanding the verdict.

I. Background

This is a personal injury action arising out of plaintiffs’ alleged exposure to poly-chlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). As alleged by plaintiffs, a submersible water pump manufactured by Myers and installed in a water well at their home in 1974 malfunctioned in 1987. Plaintiff Carol Pearl was exposed to PCBs after ingesting and showering in water from the well.

Jury…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Don Chuy, in No. 77-1412 v. The Philadelphia Eagles Football Club (Sued as "The Philadelphia Eagles"), in No. 77-1411 and the National Football LeagueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  3. Delahanty v. First Pennsylvania Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Martin v. Johns-Manville Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Charles Carter v. District of Columbia, Maurice Turner, Chief, Metropolitan Police Department Charles Carter v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Evanston v. Regional Transportation AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  2. Hayfield v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API