Friedman v. F.E. Myers Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
NEWCOMER, District Judge.
The matter is before the court on defendant F.E. Myers Co.’s (Myers) post-trial motions for new trial on jury issue, new trial on other issues, and judgment notwithstanding the verdict.
I. Background
This is a personal injury action arising out of plaintiffs’ alleged exposure to poly-chlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). As alleged by plaintiffs, a submersible water pump manufactured by Myers and installed in a water well at their home in 1974 malfunctioned in 1987. Plaintiff Carol Pearl was exposed to PCBs after ingesting and showering in water from the well.
Jury…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Don Chuy, in No. 77-1412 v. The Philadelphia Eagles Football Club (Sued as "The Philadelphia Eagles"), in No. 77-1411 and the National Football LeagueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Delahanty v. First Pennsylvania Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Martin v. Johns-Manville Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Charles Carter v. District of Columbia, Maurice Turner, Chief, Metropolitan Police Department Charles Carter v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- City of Evanston v. Regional Transportation AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
- Hayfield v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001