Legal Opinion
Hobart Bros. Co. v. Welding Supply Serv., Inc.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided February 7, 1985No. 84AP-974PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWhiteside, J.
Defendant, Welding Supply Service, Inc., appeals from a judgment of the Franklin County Municipal Court, and raises three assignments of error as follows:
“1. The trial court erred as a matter of law in overruling the defendant’s Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Civil Rule U (B)(2).
“2. The trial court erred in finding for the plaintiff contrary to the applicability of Ohio Revised Code § 13US.0B.
“3. The trial court erred in finding for the plaintiff contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence.”
Welding Supply Service, Inc. was a distributor of products manufactured by plaintiff, Hobart…
2Cited by33 opinions
- Schwartz v. Bank One, Portsmouth, N.A.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992
- Minster Farmers Cooperative Exchange Co. v. DuesOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- Scotts Company, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Central Garden & Pet Company, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Morrison v. Shanwick International Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
- Schulman v. Wolske & Blue Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1998
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.