Legal Opinion

Saling v. Flesch

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1929No. 6,423PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Angstman

This is an appeal from a judgment for defendants John and Augusta Flesch after their general demurrer to the amended complaint was sustained.

The amended complaint alleges: That in March, 1921, defendants John and Augusta Flesch gave to plaintiff an oil and gas lease on a section of land in Toole county for the term of ten years; a copy of the lease is attached to and made a part of the complaint. The lease, among other things, provides: “If no well be commenced on said land on or before the 18th day of March, 1922, this lease shall terminate as to both parties, unless the lessee on or before…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Stewart v. . Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Davis v. VidalTexas Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Sexton v. Chicago Storage Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Potts-Thompson Liquor Co. v. PottsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  5. Craig v. SummersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hartman Ranch Co. v. Associated Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Jaber v. MillerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
  3. Heiner v. S.J. Groves & Sons Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1990
  4. Indian Refining Co. v. Mary G. RobertsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1932
  5. Holman v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API