Legal Opinion

United States v. Nosal

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 1, 2013No. 08-cr-00237 EMC (NC)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART RULE 17(C) SUBPOENA TO THIRD PARTY KORN/FERRY

NATHANAEL M. COUSINS, United States Magistrate Judge.

Defendant David Nosal moves for a subpoena duces tecum under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 17(c). Nosal is charged with conspiracy and theft of trade secrets *406from his former employer, Korn/Ferry International. The issues are (1) whether the documents Nosal seeks to subpoena are material to his defense and (2) whether Korn/Ferry would be overly oppressed by producing them. After considering the parties’ briefs and a hearing on the matter, the Court…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Bowman Dairy Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. United States v. IoziaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1952
  4. Villas at Parkside Partners v. City of Farmers BranchCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
  5. United States v. SteverCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Young v. BowenDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API