Monessen Southwestern Railway Co. v. Morgan
Supreme Court of the United States
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJustice Blackmun
I agree with the Court’s conclusion that the availability of prejudgment interest in a suit under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA), 35 Stat. 65, as amended, 45 U. S. C. §51 et seq., is governed by federal law, and that the state trial court therefore was not at liberty to supplement appel-lee’s judgment on the basis of Rule 238 of the Pennsylvania *343Rules of Civil Procedure. I also agree with the Court’s conclusion that the trial court erred in refusing to instruct the jury on present value pursuant to federal law. Accordingly, I join Parts I, II-A, and III of the Court’s opinion.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Michigan Central Railroad v. VreelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway v. BuellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- General Motors Corp. v. Devex Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.