Legal Opinion
In Re Hougland
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided December 12, 1988No. Civ. No. 88-1016-PA, Bankruptcy No. 388-00874-H13PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PANNER, Chief Judge.
Appellants Estel Ray Hougland and Ruth Evelyn Hougland (Debtors) bring this appeal from a final order of the Bankruptcy Court, denying confirmation of their Chapter 13 Plan of Reorganization (Plan). This court has appellate jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158(a).
I reverse the decision of the Bankruptcy Court, and order that Debtors’ Plan be confirmed.
BACKGROUND
Appellee Lomas & Nettleton (L & N) holds a first deed of trust and a promissory note secured by Debtors’ principal residence. Debtors.fell into arrears on their payments, and L & N commenced foreclosure…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bank of Marin v. EnglandSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- In Re JablonskiUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
- In Re CromptonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
- In Re: Daniels-Head & AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Caster v. United States (In Re Caster)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- In Re Estel Ray Hougland, Ruth Evelyn Hougland, Debtors. Estel Ray Hougland Ruth Evelyn Hougland v. The Lomas & Nettleton Company, Creditor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- In Re Iris June Davis, Debtor. Allied Credit Corporation v. Iris June DavisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- In Re KleinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
- In Re HarrisDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1989
- Matter of KaczmarczykUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nebraska · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.