Legal Opinion

First Bank v. Unique Marble & Granite Corp.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 17, 2010No. 2-09-1287PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jorgensen

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff, First Bank, obtained a judgment against defendants, Unique Marble and Granite Corporation and its corporate officer, Daniel M. Hahn, and moved to collect on that judgment. James Gallo intervened, seeking fees and expenses for his duties as assignee for the benefit of Unique Marble’s creditors. First Bank moved for summary judgment against Gallo, asserting that, as a perfected secured creditor under the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) (810 ILCS 5/1 — 101 et seq. (West 2008)), it had priority over Gallo, who was a lien creditor. 810 ILCS 5/9 — 102(a)(52), 9 — 317, 9 —…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Randolph v. ScruggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Alvarez v. PappasIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
  3. In the Matter of Chaseley's Foods, Inc., D/B/A Vic's Super Foods, Debtor. Appeal of Daniel L. Freeland, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  4. Pagano v. Occidental Chemical Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  5. Paul H. Schwendener, Inc. v. Jupiter Electric Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance, Corp. v. FBOP Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017
  2. Caulfield v. The Packer Group, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2016
  3. In re Computer World Solutions, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API