Legal Opinion

Mills v. Kelley

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided September 25, 1901PublishedCited by 2 opinions

On bill and cross-bill, &c.

1Opinion of the Court

Stevens, Y. C.

The bill is filed to foreclose eight mortgages held by the com.plainants as trustees of the estate of Stephen Yail. There is no dispute as to their validity or as to the amount due thereon. The question in the cause arises on the cross-bill filed by Frederick II. Lum and others, owners of a part of the mortgaged premises, against Peter and John Conover, owners of other parts thereof. It is whether the land of the Conovers is primarily liable to satisfy the mortgage indebtedness, or whether all the land is equally liable. The property, which lies in Chatham township, Morris…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Anicker v. DoyleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. United States v. Charlene M. Owens, A/K/A CharlieCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API