Legal Opinion
Heintz v. Swimmer
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided March 12, 1996No. 68304PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AHRENS, Presiding Judge.
On May 12,1994, plaintiff, Kenneth Heintz (“client”), filed suit against defendant, David Swimmer (“attorney”), alleging negligence, breach of contract, and breach of fiduciary duties arising out of attorney’s representation of client in various legal matters. This is the fourth suit client has filed against attorney. The first three suits were dismissed without prejudice. Attorney responded to client’s petition in this suit with a motion to dismiss, asserting the affirmative defense of the statute of limitations. The trial court granted the motion and dismissed the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Thummel v. KingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
- Knisely v. LeatheSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
- Reed v. RopeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
- Anderson v. Griffin, Dysart, Taylor, Penner & Lay, P.C.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- Tudor v. TudorMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State ex rel. Goldsworthy v. KanatzarSupreme Court of Missouri · 2018
- City of Ellisville v. LohmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- Plengemeier v. Thermadyne Industries, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- Community Title Co. v. U.S. Title Guaranty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- Day v. DeVries and Associates, PCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.