Legal Opinion

Opinion No. (1983)

Missouri Attorney General Reports

Decided October 6, 1983Published

1Opinion of the Court

Dear Mr. Meyer:

This opinion is in response to your question asking:

If a recorder receives oral and written notice that the named grantee in a proposed deed, which is in his possession but not yet recorded, repudiates that deed and requests that it not be recorded, is the recorder no longer "authorized" to record the deed, or is the mere forwarding of a deed to the Recorder's Office by one party sufficient "authority" to place a "duty" on the Recorder to record the deed?

You state the facts giving rise to this question as follows:

A local bank demanded payment on a promissory note secured by a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McCune v. GoodwillieSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  2. Cravens v. RossiterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  3. Weyrauch v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  4. Lawson v. RouseMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API