Lyman Perin & Co. v. Pennsylvania Railroad

OPINION

By ROSS, J.

The only question we consider of importance' was the claim urged by the plaintiff in error that the tariff applied had not been published, and that 'the consignee was entitled therefor to the through and lower rates from points of origin to Cincinnati. That the cars' moved from points of origin in Michigan to Adrian, were there inspected and reconsigned, and delivered at Cincinnati was admitted.

Section 6, Par. .1, of the Act to Regulate Commerce, Title 49, Art. VI, 49 U. S. C. A., (Interstate Commerce Acts, Annotated, Vol. 2, page 1413), provides as follows:

“Every common…