Abdur-Ra'oof v. Department of Corrections
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
This case is before us for the second time. Previously, we concluded that a prison policy directive that prohibited prisoners from leaving work assignments for Friday afternoon Juma’ah prayer services and two congregational services, Eid-al-Fitrah, and Eid-al-Adha, 1 was neither arbitrary nor irrational and did not violate plaintiffs’ rights under the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. Abdur-Ra’oof v Dep’t of Corrections, 208 Mich App 626; 528 NW2d 840 (1995). The Supreme Court, in lieu of granting leave to appeal, remanded the case for…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Virgil Abdur-Rahman v. Michigan Department of Corrections, Kenneth McGinnisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- Werner v. McCotterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People of Michigan v. Dustin Lee MacLeodMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
- People v. WalkerMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
- People v. WalkerMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005