Legal Opinion

Abdur-Ra'oof v. Department of Corrections

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 29, 1997No. Docket 192796PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This case is before us for the second time. Previously, we concluded that a prison policy directive that prohibited prisoners from leaving work assignments for Friday afternoon Juma’ah prayer services and two congregational services, Eid-al-Fitrah, and Eid-al-Adha, 1 was neither arbitrary nor irrational and did not violate plaintiffs’ rights under the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. Abdur-Ra’oof v Dep’t of Corrections, 208 Mich App 626; 528 NW2d 840 (1995). The Supreme Court, in lieu of granting leave to appeal, remanded the case for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Virgil Abdur-Rahman v. Michigan Department of Corrections, Kenneth McGinnisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
  5. Werner v. McCotterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People of Michigan v. Dustin Lee MacLeodMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. People v. WalkerMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. People v. WalkerMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API