Legal Opinion

Ulvano v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 10, 1985No. 83-1806PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The appellant, defendant in the trial court, subsequent to his conviction and sentence, filed a Rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure motion alleging his attorney’s conflict of interest and incompetency. The trial court ordered an evidentiary hearing and then proceeded to conduct it without the presence of the defendant or counsel on his behalf. The motion was denied. We find error and reverse for a new hearing.

We recognize that it is not necessary in the first instance for a trial court to appoint counsel for a petitioner who files a Rule 3.850 motion. Graham v. State, 372 So.2d…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. WeeksSupreme Court of Florida · 1964
  2. Graham v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
  3. Hooks v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
  4. Harrell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  5. Eby v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API