Hixon v. Woodall
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Bowles, Justice.
We granted certiorari in Woodall v. Hixon, 154 Ga. App. 844 (270 SE2d 65) (1980) to determine whether the reference to seal on the note in question is adequate to qualify the. note as an instrument under seal. We conclude that it is and, therefore, reverse that portion *759of the opinion of the Court of Appeals.
Argued November 17, 1980 Decided December 2, 1980. Thomas E. Greer, for appellant. Charles E. Kuntz, for appellee.
The language of the note begins “... I promise to pay . ..” and ends “Witness my hand and seal.” Contrary to the situation in Echols v. Phillips, 112 Ga. 700…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Echols v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Woodall v. HixonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
3Cited by8 opinions
- Brown v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Jeffrey Bryant v. Optima International Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
- Nelson v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- TELFAIR FINANCE COMPANY v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
- Johnson v. HodgeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.