Bailes v. Bailes
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.
We affirm the financial aspects of the final judgment of dissolution under review on the familiar ground that each of the rulings in question represents an appropriate exercise of the trial court’s discretion. Walter v. Walter, 464 So.2d 538, (Fla.1985); Marcoux v. Marcoux, 464 So.2d 542, (Fla.1985); Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980).
The only issue which requires individualized treatment is Ms. Bailes’s claim, citing Schein v. Schein, 448 So.2d 16 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984), that she was incorrectly denied compensation for the rental value of her share of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Canakaris v. CanakarisSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
- Walter v. WalterSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- Marcoux v. MarcouxSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- Siegel v. ZimmermanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
- Finn v. FinnDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wertheimer v. WertheimerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Fischer v. FischerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987