Legal Opinion
Amalgamated Clothing & Textile Workers v. Stanbury
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Decided December 11, 1992No. 2:92CV61PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
811 F.Supp. 464 (1992)
AMALGAMATED CLOTHING AND TEXTILE WORKERS UNION, AFL-CIO, CLC, Plaintiff,
v.
STANBURY UNIFORMS, INC., Defendant.
No. 2:92CV61.
United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, N.D.
December 11, 1992.
William M. Franz, III, President, Franz and Franz, St. Louis, MO, for plaintiff.
Steven S. Griswold, Associate, Thomas O. McCarthy, Partner, McMahon and Berger, St. Louis, MO, Donald J. Cairns, Lindner and Marsack, Milwaukee, WI, for defendant.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HAMILTON, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Motion of Defendant Stanbury Uniforms, Inc. to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Litton Financial Printing Div., Litton Business Systems, Inc. v. NLRBSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Nolde Bros., Inc. v. Local No. 358, Bakery & Confectionery Workers UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Gateway Coal Co. v. United Mine WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Luden's Inc. v. Local Union No. 6 of the Bakery, Confectionery & Tobacco Workers' International UnionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co. v. SmithDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1995
- Luden's Inc. v. Local Union No. 6Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Luden's, Inc. v. Local Union No. 6, Bakery, Confect'ryTobacco Wrkrs Internat'lCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994