Legal Opinion

In re Asseff

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 1, 1949No. 5521PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGaRREtt, Chief Judge

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the decision of the Primary Examiner rejecting claims numbered 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 14, 15, 18, and 21 of appellant’s application for patent broadly entitled “Lubricating Composition.” No claim was allowed.

The application, which was filed October 25,1941, recites that it “is a continuation in part of my copending application serial No. 404,361, filed July 28,1941,” and it appears that that application matured into patent 2,261,047 (one of the references cited here) issued October 28, 1941 —…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Miller v. Eagle Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Thomson-Houston Electric Co. v. Ohio Brass Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1897

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Harry A. Pursche v. Atlas Scraper and Engineering Co., a Corporation, Atlas Scraper and Engineering Co., a Corporation v. Harry A. PurscheCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  2. Application of StanleyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1954
  3. In Re MuskatCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
  4. Application of MartinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1954
  5. Application of WarrenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API