Legal Opinion

Lebens v. Wolf

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 7, 1917No. 20,580PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Action in tlie district court for Npbles county to recover $878.25 for injuries to a stallion. The case was tried before Nelson, J., who when plaintiff rested granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the action. From an order denying plaintiff’s motion for -a new trial, he appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

The complaint alleges the loto of a stallion, in good condition, to defendant, upon the agreement that he should be used solely for farm work; that the defendant should feed and care for him and take extraordinary precaution to prevent his being injured, disabled or overworked; 'and that defendant neglected to care for the animal so that he “became kicked” and permanently injured, in which condition he was returned to plaintiff, the owner, causing a damage in the sum of $878.35. When plaintiff rested, the action was dismissed on defendant’s motion. The appeal is from the order denying a new…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Willett v. RichMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
  2. Collins v. . BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  3. Nutt v. DavisonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1913
  4. Sanford v. KimballSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1910
  5. Davis v. Tribune Job-Printing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1897

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of JernbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  2. Topinka v. Minnesota Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  3. Piepho v. M. Sigbert-Awes Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  4. Estate of Keeley v. OchsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  5. Central Mutual Insurance Co. v. WhetstoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API