Legal Opinion

Friedman v. Frank

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 2007Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Daniel Palmieri, J.

The motion by defendant Frank (sequence No. 1) and the motions (incorrectly denominated as cross motions) by defendants Hall (sequence No. 2), South Nassau Communities Hospital (sequence No. 3), and Partridge and DeBrady (sequence No. 4) to compel compliance with discovery demands relating to (i) the medical records of plaintiffs’ decedent Jeffrey Mark Friedman, and (ii) records pertaining to loss of earnings or other economic loss are granted to the extent set forth below (CPLR 3101, 3124). The cross motion by plaintiffs for a protective order and other…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Koump v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Dillenbeck v. HessNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Oden v. Chemung County Industrial Development AgencyNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Prink v. Rockefeller Center, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Johnson v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API