Legal Opinion

Farnsworth v. Ebbs

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1874Published

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, entered upon the report of a referee. The facts are stated in the opinion. cited Birdsall v. Patterson (51 N. Y., 43); Simmons v. Sisson (26 id., 264); Lobdell v. Lobdell (36 id., 327); Hildebrant v. Crawford (6 Lans., 502); Card v. Card (7 Trans. App., 146). cited Hatch v. Peugnet (64 Barb., 190); Lyon v. Snyder (61 id., 172); Simar v. Canady (53 N. Y., 298); Minier v. Minier (4 Lans., 421).

1Opinion of the Court

Gilbert, J.:

This is . a suit brought by the executors of Samuel Ward, deceased, to foreclose a mortgage given to their testator by the defendants, George W. Ebbs and his wife, Maria. The defendant, George W. Ebbs, and another defendant, who is a junior mortgagee, set up the defense of usury. The defendant, Maria, appeared in *439the suit, but did not answer. No bond or other evidence of debt accompanied the mortgage. Upon the trial, Maria Ebbs was admitted as a witness to prove the usury. She testified that she went with her husband to Mr. Ward’s house, to get the money which was loaned, and that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Birdsall v. . PattersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. Simmons v. . SissonNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
  3. Hildebrant v. CrawfordNew York Supreme Court · 1871

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API