Medved v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
JIULIANTE, Senior Judge.
Viola Medved (Claimant) petitions for review of the January 9, 2001 order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) that affirmed the order of the Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) granting the modification petition filed by Albert Gallatin Services (Employer). The primary issue before us on appeal is whether the Board erred in determining that Employer met its burden of establishing that a position was available to Claimant under Kachinski v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Vepco Constr. Co.), 516 Pa. 240, 532 A.2d 374 (1987), where Claimant would have to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Greenwich Collieries v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Sell v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Houston v. Texaco, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Lukens, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Allegheny Power v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Medved v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Medved v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Albert Gallatin Services)Supreme Court of the United States · 2003