Legal Opinion

Howes v. Rose

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 26, 1895No. 1,677PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From the Floyd Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtLotz, J.

The appellee, plaintiff below, in her complaint alleged that she was ill and in need of medicine, and applied to the appellants, defendants below, at their place of business, for Rochelle salts, a safe and harmless medicine; that instead of furnishing her said salts, the defendants carelessly and negligently furnished, sold and delivered to her, instead thereof, a quantity of Tartaric acid, a noxious, baneful and poisonous drug, which she administered to herself, believing the same to he Rochelle salts, and suffered pain and injury in consequence thereof.

The special verdict found…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Thomas v. . WinchesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
  2. Van Bracklin v. FondaNew York Supreme Court · 1815

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Roberts v. Anheuser Busch Brewing Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  2. Knoefel v. AtkinsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1907
  3. Corona Coal Co. v. SextonAlabama Court of Appeals · 1925
  4. Craig v. Baker & Holmes Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1923
  5. Edelstein v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API