Legal Opinion · Dissent

State of Maine v. Maine State Employees Association, SEIU Local 1989

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided October 6, 2016No. Docket: Ken-15-466Published

1DissentJabar, J.

[¶26] I respectfully dissent because a rational inference from the relevant language of the Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) and the emails in question supports the arbitrator’s decision.

[¶27] It is well settled that in Maine, the Court’s review of an arbitration award is a *1245narrow one, and that we will uphold an award if “any rational construction of the [a]greement could support [it],” City of Lewiston v. Lewiston Firefighters Ass’n, IAF, Local No. 785, 629 A.2d 50, 52 (Me.1993) (citations omitted) (emphasis added). Further, in determining if an arbitrator exceeded her authority in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. American Federation of State, County, & Municipal Employees, Council 93 v. City of PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  2. Union River Valley Teachers Ass'n v. Lamoine School CommitteeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  3. City of Lewiston v. Lewiston Firefighters Ass'n, IAG, Local No. 785Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API