Legal Opinion

Hanley v. Great Northern Ry. Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1923No. 5,036PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ME. CHIEF COMMISSIONEE LAW

prepared the opinion for the court.

The plaintiff, Dr. Hanley, claims to have been injured on December 22, 1917, near Oswego, Montana, by reason of a head-on collision between the train upon which he was being carried as a passenger and another of defendant’s trains. He contends that while riding in the day coach he was thrown forward from his seat by a sudden stopping of the train, thereby severely wrenching his body, straining his muscles, and rupturing his abdominal walls, by reason of which he became sick and sore, and at all times since has suffered and now…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pure Oil Co. v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1919
  2. State v. RhysMontana Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Gillespie v. Great Northern Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Lee v. HaydenMontana Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lehman & Co. v. SkadanMontana Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Prezeau v. DavisMontana Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Waddell v. CarySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API