Legal Opinion

Stoll v. Curl

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1976PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

This is a suit to quiet title to a fifteen-foot strip of land formerly owned by defendants to which plaintiffs now claim ownership by adverse possession. Plaintiffs also seek to recover damages as a result of defendants’ removal of plaintiffs’ fence constructed on the disputed strip by plaintiffs. The trial court entered a decree quieting title in plaintiffs and allowing $250 damages for the trespass. Defendants appeal. Plaintiffs cross-appeal, assigning as error the court’s action in denying their motion for a jury trial on the trespass issue and in failing to award damages for mental…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Douglas v. Humble Oil & Refining CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Kohlhagen v. CardwellOregon Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Crawford v. AbrahamOregon Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Egan v. FinneyOregon Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Overton v. BlakeOregon Supreme Court · 1976

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cessnun v. Signer Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  2. Gregory v. WeberCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  3. Portland General Electric Co. v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API