Legal Opinion

City of Paducah v. Electric Plant Board of Paducah

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 30, 1970PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REED, Judge.

The appellants-plaintiffs sued the appel-lee-defendant in the McCracken Circuit Court for in-lieu-of tax payments allegedly due under KRS 96.820 as amended in 1968. At the time of the institution of the action in the McCracken Circuit Court, the plaintiffs and the defendant were parties to a declaratory judgment action pending in the Barren Circuit Court wherein the validity of a 1968 amendment to 96.820 was posed. The judge of the McCracken Circuit Court ordered that the action instituted in his court be "dismissed without prejudice pending the determination of the action in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cooke v. GaidryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949
  2. Annie Gardner Foundation v. GardnerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1963
  3. Riddle v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1962
  4. Summe & Ratermann Co. v. City of CovingtonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1958

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Nova Research, Inc. v. Penske Truck Leasing Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  2. Harris v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1971
  3. Pelphrey v. CochranCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1970
  4. Nova Research, Inc. v. Penske Truck Leasing Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  5. Ventas, Inc. v. HCP, INC.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API