Legal Opinion

Schweinberger v. Casey

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1939PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAldrich, J.

This is an application by Gus Schweinberger, alias Gus Berger, as petitioner, against the sheriff of the county of Westchester, the warden of the Westchester County Jail, and the district attorney of Westchester county, pursuant to the provisions of article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to obtain a mandatory order (mandamus), requiring said officials to permit, the attorneys for the petitioner, and their assistants and their associates “ to confer with and interview one Magda Ludwig * * * in private at all reasonable hours, upon such occasion or occasions as they may deem necessary, advisable…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Matter of Andresen v. RiceNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  2. Matter of Durr v. Paragon Trading Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
  3. Atkins v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  4. People v. DuncanIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Matter of Towers Man. Corp. v. ThatcherNew York Court of Appeals · 1936

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. Martinez, New York County Courts1959
  2. People v. Cusano, New York County Courts1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API