Legal Opinion
Barr v. Snohomish County Sheriff
Washington Supreme Court
Decided May 9, 2019No. 96072-1PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtYu, J.
*132 *332 ¶ 1 This case asks us to decide whether the Snohomish County sheriff (the Sheriff) is required to issue a concealed pistol license (CPL) to an individual whose sealed juvenile record includes adjudications for class A felonies. In this case, the answer is no. The Sheriff is not required to issue a CPL to a person who "is prohibited from possessing a firearm under federal law." RCW 9.41.070(1)(a). Due to respondent Jerry Barr's class A felony adjudications, federal *333 law provides that it is unlawful for him to "possess in or affecting commerce, any firearm or ammunition." 18 U.S.C. § 922 (g).…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Logan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Cost Management Services, Inc. v. City of LakewoodWashington Supreme Court · 2013
- River Park Square, L.L.C. v. MigginsWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- River Park Square, LLC v. MigginsWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Frank Van Der Hule v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. BatsonWashington Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. MosesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
- Cai Hunter Mcintosh, V. State Of WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2024
- Gronquist v. Dep't of CorrectionsWashington Supreme Court · 2020
- State Of Washington v. S.g.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2019
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.