Legal Opinion

In re Orseck

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 7, 2001Published

1Per curiam

Respondent was suspended from practice for a period of 18 months (see, Matter of Orseck, 262 AD2d 862) and now applies for reinstatement.

Our examination of the papers submitted on this application indicates that respondent has complied with the provisions of the order which suspended him and with this Court’s rule regarding the conduct of suspended attorneys (see, 22 NYCRR 806.9). We are also satisfied that he has complied with the requirements of this Court’s rule regarding reinstatement (see, 22 NYCRR 806.12) and that he possesses the requisite character and fitness to resume the practice…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re OrseckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API