Legal Opinion

American Bankers Insurance v. Avco-Lycoming Division

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 16, 1979No. Civ. 18489PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WIENER, J.

A defendant is authorized to file a cross-complaint against a concurrent tortfeasor for partial indemnity on a comparative fault basis, even when the concurrent tortfeasor was not named as a defendant in the original complaint. (American Motorcycle Assn. v. Superior Court (1978) 20 Cal.3d 578, 607 [146 Cal.Rptr. 182, 578 P.2d 899]; referred to in this opinion as AMA.) A settling concurrent tortfeasor is permitted to continue to pursue his right of partial indemnity asserted by a presettlement cross-complaint against a party not named by the plaintiff. (Sears, Roebuck & Co. v.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. American Motorcycle Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Daly v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1978
  3. E. L. White, Inc. v. City of Huntington BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. River Garden Farms, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  5. Stowe v. Fritzie Hotels, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1955

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Evangelatos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Pool v. City of OaklandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Western Steamship Lines, Inc. v. San Pedro Peninsula HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Fisher v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  5. Alpha Mechanical, Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc. v. Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API