Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Dettman

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 10, 2006No. A04-975Published

1DissentGildea, J.

I respectfully dissent from the majority’s conclusion that the district court erred in imposing an upward departure sentence. The district court’s decision to depart was based on facts Dettman admitted after he executed a knowing and voluntary waiver of his trial rights. I would reverse the court of appeals and uphold the sentence imposed.

In Blakely v. Washington, the Supreme Court recognized that sentencing courts could use facts the defendant admitted in imposing sentence. 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004). The district court imposed an upward departure sentence in this…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API