Legal Opinion

Heathcock v. Brooke

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 22, 1925PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, J.,

(after stating the facts). .At the outset it may be stated that the court did not err in refusing to transfer the case to equity. In Weaver v. Arkansas National Bank, 73 Ark. 462, it was held that an answer to a suit on a note setting up the defenses of a want of consideration and a release presents purely legal defenses which are triable in law, and not in equity.

It is next insisted that the court erred in overruling the defendant’s motion for a continuance. The motion set up that if Perry Jones was present he would testify that about the latter part of October, 1919, he saw a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Weaver v. Arkansas National BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1904
  2. Gardner v. HughesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  3. Texarkana & Fort Smith Railway Co. v. AdcockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
  4. Finley v. CliftSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Winfrey v. MossSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API