Legal Opinion

Wertheimer, Swarts Shoe Co. v. Exchange Bank

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 5, 1894PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the Greene Circuit Court. — Hon. J. T. Neville, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtRombauer, P. J.

— Upon a trial of this cause the court instructed the jury to find a verdict for the defendants, which they did. The plaintiff appeals, and assigns for error that under the pleadings and evidence this instruction was erroneous.

The action is replevin by the vendor of goods against the mortgagees of the vendee. The petition is in the ordinary form, and the answer a general denial. The evidence is not preserved in full in the record, but according to the recitals of the transcript there was evidence tending to show the following facts: That the vendees made false and fraudulent representations…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cahn v. ReidMissouri Court of Appeals · 1885

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kingman-Moore Implement Co. v. EllisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1907
  2. Goebel v. TrollMissouri Court of Appeals · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API