Legal Opinion
Scranton v. Crosby
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided June 29, 1937PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.
The plaintiff in the first action, hereinafter called the plaintiff, a boy between seven and eight years of age, was injured at an intersection of ways in West Bridgewater by a collision between the bicycle upon which he was riding and an automobile driven by the defendant. The second action is by the father of the plaintiff for consequential damages. The plaintiff emerged into the intersection from a “one-way” street on which he had been riding his bicycle in the forbidden direction. However, in answer to a question, the jury found specially that the plaintiff’s violation of law did not…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bourne v. WhitmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Newcomb v. Boston Protective DepartmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
- Falk v. FinkelmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Baggs v. HirschfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Chase v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Squires v. FraskaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Beauvais v. Springfield Institution for SavingsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Salvato v. DiSILVA TRANSPORTATION CO. INC.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
- Reardon v. MarstonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Dean v. LeonardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.