Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hughey v. Review Board of the Indiana Department of Employment & Training Services

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 8, 1994No. 93A02-9312-EX-678Published

1DissentHoffman, Judge

I respectfully dissent. Hughey was not discharged until after being convicted of battery. Thus, he was discharged for just cause pursuant to IND.CODE § 22-4-15-1(d)(8) (1992 Supp.). Two cases are relevant to this determination, Holmes v. Review Bd. of Ind. Sec. Div. (1983), Ind.App., 451 N.E.2d 83, and Sparks v. Dept. of Emp. & Training Serv. (1988), Ind.App., 531 N.E.2d 227.

In Holmes, an employee was discharged during incarceration for a charge which was later dismissed, and he was subsequently denied unemployment benefits. Holmes at 84. This Court reversed the denial of benefits holding…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Holmes v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Div.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Sparks v. Indiana Department of Employment & Training ServicesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API