Legal Opinion

People v. Ramey

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 3, 1924No. Docket No. 1198PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, J.

The defendant was convicted of the crime of incest, committed upon his daughter, a girl of sixteen years of age. He appeals from the judgment following the verdict and from the order denying a motion for new trial. On this appeal he suggests that the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict. Wc have examined the record with care and find that the testimony of the prosecutrix is clear, convincing, and without substantial conflict. In addition to this it is corroborated,by the testimony of her sister, a girl of fourteen years of age.

Objections are made to the ruling of the trial court in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. People v. WolffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. People v. ReynoldsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  4. People v. LeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. People v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  3. People v. JoriCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. People v. SwaarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API