Legal Opinion
J.S. Masonry, Inc. v. Industrial Commission
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided December 19, 2006No. 1-06-0717 WCPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hoffman
The claimant, Josef Piatek, filed an application for adjustment of claim pursuant to the Workers’ Compensation Act (Act) (820 ILCS 305/1 et seq. (West 2002)), seeking benefits for injuries he received while in the employ of J.S. Masonry, Inc. (the Company). The Industrial Commission (Commission) awarded the claimant benefits under the Act and the circuit court of Cook County confirmed the Commission’s decision. The Company now appeals that judgment. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
The following factual recitation is taken from the evidence presented at the arbitration hearing.
The…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Orsini v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
- Caterpillar, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
- Thomas v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
- Archer Daniels Midland Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
- Benson v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- City of Springfield v. Illinois Workers' Compensation CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
- Johnson v. WORKERS'COMPENSATION COM'NAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
- Fraternal Order of Police v. Illinois Labor Relations BoardAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
- City of Chicago v. Illinios Workers Compensation CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
- Fraternal Order of Police v. ILRBAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011