Legal Opinion

Triangle Construction v. City of Phoenix

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 1, 1985No. 1 CA-CIV 7393PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JACOBSON, Judge.

This appeal involves the interpretation of a written contract between the City of Phoenix and Triangle Construction, a division of Bentley-Dille Gradall Rentals, Inc. (Triangle). The issues which we must determine are: (1) whether Triangle was entitled to payment for equipment standby time in excess of eight hours per day and on Saturdays, Sundays and holidays, (2) whether there was evidence to support the trial court’s determination that Triangle should be paid a 90% equipment rental rate for equipment operating in excess of 352 hours, and (3) whether standby time was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pyeatte v. PyeatteCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  2. Abrams v. Horizon Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Correa v. Pecos Valley Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
  4. Huskie v. Ames Bros. Motor & Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  5. Paul Schoonover, Inc. v. Ram Construction Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. AROK Construction Co. v. Indian Construction ServicesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  2. Dobyns v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  3. J.D. Land Co. v. KillianCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
  4. Melendez v. Hallmark InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  5. Terry v. Gaslight Square AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API