Legal Opinion
United States v. Kay Lynn Frye
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided June 21, 1984No. 82-2656PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FLAUM, Circuit Judge.
This appeal stems from the defendant’s guilty plea and subsequent conviction in federal court on a charge of bank larceny. Approximately one year after her conviction, the defendant filed a motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1982), claiming that her guilty plea was invalid because it was not made knowingly and intelligently. The district court dismissed her section 2255 motion without an evidentiary hearing, and the defendant appealed. We reverse the district court and remand for an evidentiary hearing on the question of whether the defendant’s guilty plea was…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- United States v. James P. LedonneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Rene Rodriguez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- United States of America, Plaintif-Appellee v. Biagio Cirrincione and Tom CirrincioneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Scott A. Fountain, United States of America v. Matthew D. GrangerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Latroy D. Ray, Johnny Lee May, and Boyd McChristionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.