Legal Opinion

Brisco v. Lancaster Texas

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided June 23, 2021No. 3:20-cv-00643Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION RODNEY BRISCO, AS § ADMINISTRATOR FOR THE § ESTATE OF MICHAEL BRISCO, § § Plaintiff, § § v. § Civil Action No. 3:20-cv-00643-E § CITY OF LANCASTER, TEXAS, § and ZACHARY BEAUCHAMP, § § Defendants. § MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court is defendant Zachary Beauchamp’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 29). Having carefully considered Beauchamp’s motion, the parties’ briefing, and applicable law, the Court finds the motion should be granted for the following reasons. BACKGROUND On March 18, 2018,…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API