Legal Opinion

McMickle v. Nickens

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided April 13, 1954No. 1465PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOOD, Associate Judge.

Plaintiff’s automobile was struck and damaged by a truck owned by defendant and driven by his twenty-nine year old son. Plaintiff sued defendant and pitched her case solely on that part of Code 1951, § 40-403, which provides:

“Whenever any motor vehicle, after the passage of this chapter, shall be operated upon the public highways of the District of Columbia by any person oth er than the owner, with the consent of ■ the owner, express or implied, the operator thereof shall, in case of accident, be deemed to be the agent of the owner of such motor vehicle, and the proof of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Simon v. DewDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hancock v. MorrisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1961
  2. Miller v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API