Legal Opinion

Askar v. Health Providers Choice, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided October 18, 2021No. 5:19-cv-06125Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 7 MAHA ASKAR, Case No. 19-cv-06125-BLF 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR 9 v. FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND 10 HEALTH PROVIDERS CHOICE, INC., MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES 11 Defendant. [Re: ECF Nos. 41, 42] 12 13 Before the Court are (1) Plaintiff’s Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement; 14 and a Motion for Attorney’s Fees, Costs, Service Award, and Settlement Administration 15 Expenses. See ECF Nos. 41 (“Fees Mot.”), 42 (“Final App. Mot.”). No oppositions have been 16…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  4. Staton v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. In Re Bluetooth Headset Products LiabilityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API