Askar v. Health Providers Choice, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 7 MAHA ASKAR, Case No. 19-cv-06125-BLF 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR 9 v. FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND 10 HEALTH PROVIDERS CHOICE, INC., MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES 11 Defendant. [Re: ECF Nos. 41, 42] 12 13 Before the Court are (1) Plaintiff’s Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement; 14 and a Motion for Attorney’s Fees, Costs, Service Award, and Settlement Administration 15 Expenses. See ECF Nos. 41 (“Fees Mot.”), 42 (“Final App. Mot.”). No oppositions have been 16…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Staton v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- In Re Bluetooth Headset Products LiabilityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.